gio’s WeBlog

gio’s WeBlog random header image

Cybercops for Cybercrime

In order to ensure the digital control of the examination of the crime in the United States, in some states are seeking to limit the practice of Private Investigators. North America and South Carolina, Georgia, New York, Nevada, Texas, Virginia and Washington are just some of the states, the operative part of the mandatory licensing of all forensic investigators.

One of the biggest problems around the study of digital crime, the issue of jurisdiction. Digital crime without borders. Someone in New York for the celebration of criminal activity in Los Angeles, but its his office. According to the new laws of any investigation of this crime must be licensed in New York and LA for its findings are admissible in a court of law. If care to find digital evidence, in all other countries, PI investigators should apply to them, too. Evidence from unlizenzierten Tribunal investigators is excluded and could lead to what the prosecution of the perpetrator of the criminal offence.

Professionals computing across no problems with their attempts to resolve them. Its main objective is that they are forced, in a place and inappropriate deal with a category rather than their own. They fear that the measures taken by anyone with a license IP to affirm the credibility of forensic evidence investigation unnecessarily involved and the scope of the image to be tarnished beyond repair. Their argument is that if they are to be made redundant, then it must also be regularly inhibitors of the license for sensitive and specialized in work, data collection and retrieval.
What is needed to give more education on all sides. Forensic investigators need to know more about the legal procedures, and what is considered as evidence admissible, for example, the preservation of the chain of custody of evidence and the proper documentation of the results. Prosecutors should know more, what is and what is not possible, so they recognize the right to know when absurd to question the credibility of evidence.

If PIs want of digital culture in the investigation should be able to demonstrate their competence in this area. There should be a standard examination that all aspiring digital investigators must pass in order to create conditions for a statutory license PI investigators. Standard methods makes it easier for investigators to work within the limits.

Standardization is also contributing to the transparency in an area which is the peculiarity of places, an occultation.
Regulations are needed in all sectors of activity. They help the work in the industry, in order to take maximum advantage of their skills and create a sense of accountability and responsibility. There is no doubt that the field of numerical analysis and regulations, such as the absence of evidence is open to compromise. But, the legislature must ensure that regulations on the industry are designed to protect, and should not distract from its credibility. Stan King, and the investigation of the response Forensic Practice Verizon Business Services, said: "How can a doctor, the medical school went to work in the field of continuing education and maintains her medical certificates, it is the level of responsibility, we need the Forensic digital. " I do not believe that the courts of South Carolina to discuss.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

posted on March 22nd, 2008 · 103 Views
Tags: Computers

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment

ss_blog_claim=d114f1770c27de0d61bc7839193f9fa8 ss_blog_claim=d114f1770c27de0d61bc7839193f9fa8